Xeon E3-1240 v5 2015 4 cores / 8 threads, 80 Watt 5.33 Xeon Silver 4216 2019 16 cores / 32 threads, 100 Watt 13.33 +150% i3-12100F i5-13600K i9-14900KS Ryzen 5 5500 Ryzen 5 7500F Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX Silver 4216 outperforms E3-1240 v5 by a whopping 150% based on our aggregate benchmark results. Xeon E3-1240 v5 Xeon Silver 4216 Comparing Xeon E3-1240 v5 and Xeon Silver 4216 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price. Performance per price, higher is better. Xeon Silver 4216 has 385% better value for money than Xeon E3-1240 v5. Xeon E3-1240 v5 and Xeon Silver 4216 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results. Information on Xeon E3-1240 v5 and Xeon Silver 4216 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one.Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters. Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1240 v5 and Xeon Silver 4216. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology. Xeon E3-1240 v5 and Xeon Silver 4216 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks. Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1240 v5 and Xeon Silver 4216 are enumerated here. Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1240 v5 and Xeon Silver 4216.Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported. General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any. Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon E3-1240 v5 and Xeon Silver 4216 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces. APIs supported by Xeon E3-1240 v5 and Xeon Silver 4216 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included. Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1240 v5 and Xeon Silver 4216. Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better. This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly. Xeon E3-1240 v55.33 Xeon Silver 421613.33 +150% Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption andphysics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Xeon E3-1240 v58244 Xeon Silver 421620613 +150% GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core. Xeon E3-1240 v51293 +26.6% Xeon Silver 42161021 GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores. Xeon E3-1240 v54320 Xeon Silver 42167799 +80.5% Xeon E3-1240 v5 has 25% lower power consumption. Xeon Silver 4216, on the other hand, has a 150.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads. The Xeon Silver 4216 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E3-1240 v5 in performance tests. Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1240 v5 and Xeon Silver 4216, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer. Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU. Xeon E3-1240 v5 Xeon Silver 4216 Like Like We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page. Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself. 3.9153 votes Rate Xeon E3-1240 v5 on a scale of 1 to 5: 3.319 votes Rate Xeon Silver 4216 on a scale of 1 to 5: Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1240 v5 or Xeon Silver 4216, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.Aggregate performance score
Contents
Primary details
Place in performance ranking 1156 555 Place by popularity not in top-100 not in top-100 Cost-effectiveness evaluation 9.47 45.96 Market segment Server Server Series Intel Xeon E3 Intel Xeon Silver Architecture codename Skylake-DT (2015) Cascade Lake (2019−2020) Release date 19 October 2015 (8 years ago) 2 April 2019 (5 years ago) Launch price (MSRP) $282 $1,002 Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Detailed specifications
Physical cores 4 (Quad-Core) 16 (Hexadeca-Core) Threads 8 32 Base clock speed 3.5 GHz 2.1 GHz Boost clock speed 3.9 GHz 3.2 GHz Bus type DMI 3.0 no data Bus rate 4 × 8 GT/s no data Multiplier 35 21 L1 cache 256 KB 1 MB L2 cache 1 MB 16 MB L3 cache 8 MB (shared) 22 MB Chip lithography 14 nm 14 nm Die size 122 mm2 no data Maximum core temperature no data 79 °C Number of transistors 1,750 million no data 64 bit support + + Windows 11 compatibility - + Compatibility
Number of CPUs in a configuration 1 (Uniprocessor) 2 (Multiprocessor) Socket FCLGA1151,FCLGA2011 FCLGA3647 Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 100 Watt Technologies and extensions
Instruction set extensions Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 AES-NI + + AVX + + vPro + + Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) + + Speed Shift no data + Turbo Boost Technology 2.0 2.0 Hyper-Threading Technology + + TSX + + Idle States + no data Thermal Monitoring + - Turbo Boost Max 3.0 no data - Status Discontinued Launched Deep Learning Boost - + Security technologies
TXT + + EDB + + Secure Key + no data MPX + - SGX Yes with both Intel® SPS and Intel® ME no data OS Guard + no data Virtualization technologies
VT-d + + VT-x + + EPT + + Memory specs
Supported memory types DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600 DDR4-2400 Maximum memory size 64 GB 1 TB Max memory channels 2 6 Maximum memory bandwidth 34.134 GB/s 115.212 GB/s ECC memory support + + Graphics specifications
Integrated graphics card N/A no data Graphics image quality
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 N/A no data Max resolution over eDP N/A no data Max resolution over DisplayPort N/A no data Max resolution over VGA N/A no data Graphics API support
DirectX N/A no data OpenGL N/A no data Peripherals
PCIe version 3.0 3.0 PCI Express lanes 16 48 Synthetic benchmark performance
Combined synthetic benchmark score
Passmark
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
Gaming performance
Pros & cons summary
Performance score 5.33 13.33 Recency 19 October 2015 2 April 2019 Physical cores 4 16 Threads 8 32 Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 100 Watt Vote for your favorite
Similar processor comparisons
Community ratings
Questions & comments
Xeon E31240 v5 vsXeon E31260L v5
Xeon Silver4216 vsXeon E52673 v4
Xeon E31240 v5 vsXeon E31230 v6
Xeon E31235L v5 vsRyzen 75700X3D
Xeon E31230 v6 vsXeon D1813NT
Xeon E31230 v6 vsCore i56440HQ
Xeon E31230 V5 vsRyzen 78845HS
Xeon E31240 v5 vsEPYC4464P
Xeon E31240 v5 vsCore 7150UL
Xeon E31240 v6 vsRyzen 57520U
Xeon E31240 v6 vsXeon Silver4410Y